Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (5) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (5) TMI 601 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the resolution plan under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Viability and feasibility of the resolution plan.
3. Concessions and exemptions sought by the resolution applicant.
4. Arrangement between the corporate debtor and Merchem India P. Ltd. (MIPL).
5. Uniformity in the reduction of debt for various creditors.
6. Compliance with legal provisions and regulations.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:
The resolution professional filed Miscellaneous Application No. 515 of 2018 seeking approval of the resolution plan submitted by Acme Chem Ltd. under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for the corporate debtor. The resolution plan was unanimously approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) on September 12, 2018, as it met the conditions stipulated under Section 30(2) and was not barred under Section 29A of the I and B Code, 2016.

2. Viability and Feasibility of the Resolution Plan:
The CoC initially approved the resolution plan based on its evaluation matrix, which rated Acme Chem Ltd.'s plan higher than that of Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd. However, the tribunal sought further explanation regarding the viability and feasibility of the plan. The CoC later confirmed that the plan was feasible and viable even without specific concessions/exemptions mentioned in the resolution plan.

3. Concessions and Exemptions Sought:
The resolution applicant sought several reliefs and concessions, including exemptions from compliance with reduction of share capital, preferential allotment guidelines, and various environmental and fiscal incentives. The tribunal approved specific concessions and exemptions enumerated under paragraphs 7.2 (A and B), 8.1 (A, N, O, P, Q, R, S), and other related paragraphs of the resolution plan.

4. Arrangement Between Corporate Debtor and MIPL:
The tribunal raised concerns about the arrangement between the corporate debtor and MIPL for the manufacturing facility. The CoC clarified that even if the agreement with MIPL was not renewed, it would not render the resolution plan unviable or infeasible.

5. Uniformity in Reduction of Debt:
The tribunal questioned the lack of uniformity in the reduction of debt for various creditors. The CoC confirmed that the resolution plan provided for repayment of operational creditors' liabilities at a value not less than what would be paid in liquidation, ensuring no discrimination among creditors of the same class.

6. Compliance with Legal Provisions:
The tribunal ensured that the resolution plan met the requirements of Section 30(2) of the I and B Code, 2016, and relevant regulations. The plan was not in contravention of any provisions of Section 29A. The tribunal approved the resolution plan with specific concessions and exemptions, making it binding on all stakeholders.

Conclusion:
The tribunal approved the resolution plan submitted by Acme Chem Ltd., granting specific concessions and exemptions. The moratorium ceased from the date of the order, and the resolution professional was directed to forward all records to the IBBI. The approved resolution plan became effective immediately, and the resolution professional was instructed to notify all participants and the resolution applicant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates