Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2019 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (7) TMI 452 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Payment of interest on belated tax liability under CST Act and TNGST Act.
2. Waiver of interest sought by the writ petitioner.
3. Interpretation of Section 31 of TNVAT Act regarding remission of tax, penalty, interest, or fee.
4. Imposition of conditions by the Court for considering the representation for remission.

Analysis:
1. The judgment addresses the issue of payment of interest on belated tax liability under both the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act) and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act (TNGST Act). It is acknowledged that both Acts provide for the imposition of interest for delayed payment of tax liabilities.

2. The writ petitioner sought a waiver of interest on the belated tax payment. The Court noted that the first writ petition related to CST Act with a liability of ?42,127, which the petitioner agreed to pay within a fortnight. Failure to pay within the stipulated time would revive the impugned order.

3. The second writ petition pertained to the TNGST Act, with a substantial interest amount of ?39,98,914. The petitioner had made a representation seeking waiver, citing Section 31 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (TNVAT Act). The Court considered the power of the Government to remit tax, penalty, interest, or fee under this provision.

4. The Court imposed a condition for the Government to consider the representation for remission. The petitioner was directed to pay ?10,00,000 within eight weeks, representing 25% of the total interest due. The Court emphasized that the power to grant remission rested with the Government as defined in the TNVAT Act, and instructed the State counsel to communicate the order to the Government for further action.

In conclusion, the Court ordered the petitioner to make the specified payment within the given timeframe and directed the Government to consider the remission application upon compliance. The judgment provided detailed directions and conditions for the resolution of the issues raised in the writ petitions, ensuring a fair and transparent process while upholding the legal provisions under the relevant Acts.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates