Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2019 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (8) TMI 313 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Dismissal of appeal by Telangana Vat Appellate Tribunal for failure to pay pre-deposit amount.
2. Legal implications of failure to pay pre-deposit amount within stipulated period.
3. Precedent set by the Supreme Court regarding belated payment of pre-deposit.

Analysis:
The High Court addressed the grievance raised by the petitioner, who contended that their appeal was dismissed by the Telangana Vat Appellate Tribunal due to non-payment of the required pre-deposit amount within the specified timeframe. The Tribunal's decision was based on the petitioner's failure to comply with the 37.5% pre-deposit demand as mandated by Section 33 of the Telangana Vat Added Tax Act, 2005 within 120 days of receiving the order under appeal.

The primary issue before the Court was whether the failure to make the pre-deposit within the stipulated period would render the appeal invalid. The Court noted that this question had been previously settled by the Supreme Court in the case of S.E. GRAPHITES PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF TELANGANA, where it was held that a delayed payment of the pre-deposit amount does not invalidate the appeal. The Supreme Court's ruling emphasized that such appeals should be considered on their merits despite the belated payment of the pre-deposit.

Consequently, the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the petitioner, thereby overturning the Telangana Vat Appellate Tribunal's order dated 12.02.2019, which dismissed the petitioner's appeal in A.R. No. 153 of 2018. The Court directed that the appeal be remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration on its merits. Additionally, any pending miscellaneous petitions were closed in light of this final order, with no specific costs imposed on either party.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates