Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2019 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (9) TMI 517 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Challenge to order revising assessment for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 beyond the statutory limitation period.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a registered dealer, challenged the revision of assessments for the mentioned years beyond the statutory limitation period. The original assessments were deemed completed on 30.06.2012, and any revision should have been within six years from that date. The notice of proposal for revision was issued on 03.09.2018, clearly exceeding the six-year limit. The respondent argued that payments made before Enforcement Wing Officials justified the revision orders, but the court emphasized the importance of the limitation period under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act.

The petitioner contended that the revision notice issued after six years rendered the assessment vitiated on limitation grounds. The court noted that the revision notice was indeed issued beyond the prescribed period. The government advocate admitted this fact. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer should have initiated any revision within the statutory time frame. The court rejected the argument that an inspection date or tax payment could be considered as the start of the revision exercise, highlighting the importance of the notice of proposal as the starting point for the limitation period.

The court referred to a recent decision and analyzed the term "determine" as per Section 27(1)(a) of the TNVAT Act. It highlighted that the term implies a specific process of assessment and determination within the statutory period. The court emphasized that the date of the revisional notice is crucial for determining the limitation period. The court cited legal dictionaries and previous judgments to support its interpretation of the term "determine" in the context of fiscal laws.

Based on the factual and legal analysis, the court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned assessment orders due to being barred by limitation. The court concluded that the revision orders were determined after the expiration of the six-year period from the date of assessment, as required by Section 27(1)(a) of the TNVAT Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory time limits in assessment revisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates