Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (9) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (9) TMI 796 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the unpaid amount claimed by the Financial Creditor from the Corporate Debtor falls within the definition of "Financial Debt".
2. Whether the "Financial Debt" is time-barred.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Definition of Financial Debt:

The Financial Creditor, M/s. Val-Met Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) against the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Trusted Aerospace Engineering Pvt. Ltd., to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Financial Creditor claimed an outstanding amount of ?2,13,61,067/- as of 05.09.2014. The Corporate Debtor had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Financial Creditor on 20.08.2013, where the Financial Creditor agreed to invest ?48.00 Crores and manage the company's liabilities and working capital.

The Financial Creditor argued that the amounts disbursed to the Corporate Debtor for working capital, salaries, and statutory dues were loans or extensions of credit. This was supported by statements from the Bank of Maharashtra and acknowledgments from the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor, however, contended that the MoU did not indicate a loan but was an arrangement for the Financial Creditor to take over the company, and thus, there was no "Financial Debt" as defined under Section 5(8) of the I&B Code.

Upon review, the tribunal concluded that the money infused by the Financial Creditor into the Corporate Debtor was part of a purchase agreement, carrying the commercial effect of borrowing. This transaction fell within the purview of Section 5(8)(f) of the I&B Code, 2016, which includes any transaction having the commercial effect of a borrowing. Therefore, the unpaid amount claimed by the Financial Creditor was deemed to be a "Financial Debt."

2. Time-barred Debt:

The Corporate Debtor argued that the debt was time-barred since the last payment was made on 04.09.2014, and the application was filed on 22.06.2018, beyond the three-year limitation period. The Financial Creditor countered this by presenting WhatsApp messages exchanged between the parties from 07.07.2015 to 28.01.2016, where the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt and assured repayment.

The tribunal considered these WhatsApp messages as admissible evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and concluded that the acknowledgment of debt within these messages extended the limitation period. Since the application was filed within three years from the last acknowledgment of debt, it was not time-barred.

Conclusion:

The tribunal found that the Financial Creditor had established the existence of a financial debt and that the debt was not time-barred. Consequently, the application to initiate the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor was admitted. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and a moratorium was declared, prohibiting suits, asset transfers, and recovery actions against the Corporate Debtor during the CIRP period. The IRP was directed to take charge of the Corporate Debtor's management and comply with the necessary provisions of the I&B Code.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates