Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (9) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (9) TMI 820 - AAR - GST


Issues involved:
Classification of Fusible Interlining fabric under HSN 5903 or based on the blend of yarn in chapter 52-55.

Analysis:

Classification of Fusible Interlining fabric:
The case involved an application filed seeking an advance ruling on whether Fusible Interlining fabric should be classified under HSN 5903 or based on the blend of yarn in chapter 52-55. The applicant, M/s. Micro Interlinings Pvt. Ltd., requested the ruling under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. A preliminary hearing was conducted, during which the applicant sought additional time for submissions. Subsequently, the applicant voluntarily requested to withdraw the application, which was granted without delving into the merits or detailed facts of the case.

Withdrawal of application:
The applicant, M/s. Micro Interlinings Pvt. Ltd., voluntarily requested to withdraw their application seeking an advance ruling on the classification of Fusible Interlining fabric. This request was made after a preliminary hearing and the grant of additional time for submissions. The Authority for Advance Ruling allowed the withdrawal of the application without further examination of the case's details or merits.

Disposal of application:
The order issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling stated that the application in GST ARA form No. 01 of M/s. Talreja Textile Industries Pvt. Ltd., referencing ARA No. 10 dated 30.04.2019, was disposed of as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally. The disposal of the application was based on the applicant's request to withdraw the application without any conditions attached.

In conclusion, the judgment highlighted the voluntary withdrawal of the application seeking an advance ruling on the classification of Fusible Interlining fabric, without delving into the substantive classification issue. The decision to allow the withdrawal without further examination signifies the applicant's prerogative to retract the application at their discretion.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates