Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (10) TMI 844 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Characterization of Lease Rent Income
2. Disallowance of Interest Paid on Loan
3. Taxation of Sale of Depreciable Assets
4. Disallowance of Depreciation and Expenses on Motor Car
5. Disallowance of Educational Expenses

Detailed Analysis:

1. Characterization of Lease Rent Income:
The assessee argued that the lease rent income should be taxed as 'Business Income' instead of 'Income from House Property', as the main object of the company was to deal in properties. The Tribunal referred to its own decision in the assessee's case for A.Y. 2010-11, where it was held that rental receipts were rightly claimed as 'Business Income'. The Tribunal upheld this view, directing the A.O. to assess the rental receipts as 'Business Income'. Consequently, the expenses disallowed due to this re-characterization were also to be allowed.

2. Disallowance of Interest Paid on Loan:
Given the Tribunal's decision to treat the rental income as 'Business Income', the alternative claim regarding the disallowance of interest paid on loans for properties held as depreciable assets under 'Income from House Property' was rendered infructuous and dismissed.

3. Taxation of Sale of Depreciable Assets:
The assessee contended that the sale of properties, which were depreciable assets, should be taxed under Sec. 50 as 'Short Term Capital Gain' (STCG) instead of 'Long Term Capital Gain' (LTCG). The Tribunal, agreeing with the assessee, noted that the properties formed part of the 'block of assets' and were used in the business. Thus, the profit on sale should be computed under Sec. 50, reducing the sale consideration from the block of assets. The Tribunal vacated the A.O.'s assessment of the profit as LTCG and allowed the assessee's appeal on this ground.

4. Disallowance of Depreciation and Expenses on Motor Car:
The A.O. disallowed depreciation and expenses on a motor car registered in the name of the director, reasoning that it was not used wholly for the company's business. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that the car, purchased by the company and used for its business, should be eligible for depreciation and related expenses, regardless of registration in the director's name. The Tribunal cited various judicial pronouncements supporting this view and vacated the disallowance of motor vehicle expenses.

5. Disallowance of Educational Expenses:
The assessee claimed educational expenses for a director's management degree from Harvard Business School, arguing it was for the company's benefit. The A.O. disallowed this, stating the director was also involved with other companies. The Tribunal, however, found the expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for the business purpose of the assessee company. It cited judicial precedents supporting the allowance of such expenses and deleted the disallowance.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the A.O. to treat rental income as 'Business Income', compute the sale of properties under Sec. 50, and allow depreciation and educational expenses as claimed by the assessee. The appeal was allowed in terms of these observations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates