Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2019 (12) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (12) TMI 806 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge under GST.
2. Applicable GST rate for Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge.
3. Delay in filing the appeal.

Detailed Analysis:

Classification of Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge under GST:
The primary issue revolves around the appropriate classification of Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge (NPL) for GST purposes. The appellant, a pharmaceutical company, argued that NPL should be classified under Chapter 30.04 as a medicament, attracting a 12% GST rate. They contended that NPL is used for therapeutic purposes to aid in nicotine consumption cessation and has multiple medicinal benefits, including safeguarding against life-threatening diseases.

The Advance Ruling Authority (AAR) had previously ruled that NPL should be classified under Chapter Heading 38.24, attracting an 18% GST rate. This was based on Chapter Note 1(b) to Chapter 30, which excludes preparations intended to assist smokers to stop smoking from Chapter 30. The Appellate Authority upheld this ruling, noting that NPL is primarily an aid for nicotine replacement therapy and does not treat any illness or disease, thus not qualifying as a medicament.

Applicable GST Rate for Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge:
The appellant sought a ruling on the appropriate GST rate for NPL. The AAR had determined that NPL falls under Chapter Heading 38.24, which attracts an 18% GST rate as per SI.No 97 of Schedule III of Notification No 01/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Appellate Authority upheld this classification and GST rate, rejecting the appellant's argument that NPL should be taxed at 12% under Chapter 30.04.

Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal was filed 57 days after the receipt of the AAR's order, exceeding the initial 30-day period allowed under Section 100(2) of the CGST Act. The Appellate Authority noted that the appellant did not provide reasons for the delay but decided to condone the delay in the interest of justice, as it was within their condonable powers.

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority upheld the AAR's ruling that Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge is classifiable under Chapter Heading 38.24, attracting an 18% GST rate. The appeal was dismissed on all accounts, and the delay in filing the appeal was condoned.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates