Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2020 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (5) TMI 156 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Classification of imported goods and claim for exemption from customs duty.
2. Submission of Country of Origin Certificates and insistence on Bank Guarantee by customs authorities.
3. Retroactive check by competent authority in Indonesia and obligation to return Bank Guarantees.
4. Compliance with Customs Tariff rules regarding AIFTA certificate of origin and retroactive checks.
5. Representation to Deputy Commissioner of Customs for return of Bonds and Bank Guarantees.
6. Entitlement to release of Bank Guarantees based on verification certificates from Indonesian Government.

Issue 1: Classification of imported goods and claim for exemption from customs duty
The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in internal trade, imported gold granules and classified them under CTH No.7108 1300 of the Customs Tariff Act. They claimed exemption from customs duty under a specific notification. The exemption was subject to proving the goods' origin from Indonesia, as per the Customs Tariff rules.

Issue 2: Submission of Country of Origin Certificates and insistence on Bank Guarantee
The petitioner submitted Country of Origin Certificates from Indonesia to claim duty exemption. However, the customs authorities insisted on a Bank Guarantee despite the certificates and a circular from the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The petitioner, under duress, provided Bonds and Bank Guarantees to clear the goods.

Issue 3: Retroactive check by competent authority in Indonesia and obligation to return Bank Guarantees
A retroactive check by the Indonesian Government confirmed the goods' origin in Indonesia. The petitioner argued that the respondents should return the Bank Guarantees based on this verification, as per Customs Tariff rules.

Issue 4: Compliance with Customs Tariff rules regarding AIFTA certificate of origin and retroactive checks
The petitioner cited Customs Tariff rules requiring the return of AIFTA certificates if not accepted by the importing party. They argued that the retroactive check should have been completed within a specified period, which was not done by the respondents in this case.

Issue 5: Representation to Deputy Commissioner of Customs for return of Bonds and Bank Guarantees
The petitioner made a representation to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs requesting the return of Bonds and Bank Guarantees, highlighting the non-initiation of retroactive verification within the stipulated time frame.

Issue 6: Entitlement to release of Bank Guarantees based on verification certificates from Indonesian Government
Based on verification certificates from the Indonesian Government, the petitioner was deemed entitled to the release of Bank Guarantees. The court directed the respondents to release the Bank Guarantees and complete provisional assessments within a specified time frame.

In conclusion, the High Court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the respondents to release the Bank Guarantees and complete provisional assessments within the specified timeline, as the goods' origin was confirmed, resolving the issues raised by the petitioner regarding duty exemption and compliance with Customs Tariff rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates