Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2020 (7) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 344 - AAR - GST


Issues:
- Classification of vessel charter hire charges under GST Act

Analysis:
1. Facts of the Case:
- The applicant, a company engaged in port operations, sought an advance ruling on the rate of IGST on vessel charter hire charges.

2. Applicant's Interpretation:
- The applicant argued that the Tug Jupiter's services fall under SAC 996602 for rental services of water vessels or under SAC 997319 for leasing services of machinery.

3. Record of Personal Hearing:
- The authorized representative filed for adjournment but later reiterated the submission during the personal hearing.

4. Discussion and Findings:
- The Authority examined whether the Tug Jupiter charter falls under SAC 996602 for rental services of water vessels or SAC 997319 for leasing services of machinery.
- The Authority referred to the relevant notifications and explanatory notes under the GST Act to determine the classification.
- It was noted that tugs are not considered machinery, equipment, or tools independently but are classified as vessels.
- Based on the analysis, the Authority ruled that the Tug Jupiter charter falls under Sl.No. 10 of Heading 9966, attracting a tax rate of 5%.

5. Ruling:
- The Authority classified the vessel charter hire charges under Sl.No. 10 of Heading 9966, subject to fulfilling conditions, attracting a tax rate of 5%.

This detailed analysis of the judgment provides insights into the classification of vessel charter hire charges under the GST Act, emphasizing the specific provisions and interpretations considered by the Authority for Advance Rulings in Andhra Pradesh.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates