Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2020 (9) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 475 - Tri - Companies Law


Issues:
Approval of Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of Companies Act, 2013.

Analysis:
1. The Tribunal heard the counsel for the Petitioner Companies and noted no objections were raised against the Scheme of Arrangement involving three companies and their respective shareholders.

2. The Scheme sought sanction under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, for the demerger and restructuring of the companies involved, aiming to enhance operational efficiency, management focus, and shareholder value.

3. Each Petitioner Company had approved the Scheme through Board Resolutions, with an Appointed Date of 31st March, 2019, and specific business activities for each company were outlined.

4. Compliance with all requirements and directives of the Tribunal, along with necessary accounting entries and adherence to Accounting Standards, was confirmed by the Petitioner Companies.

5. The Regional Director's Report highlighted various aspects, including the appointed date, compliance with Accounting Standards, shareholder approvals, and notice requirements to concerned authorities.

6. The Petitioner Companies addressed each observation of the Regional Director, confirming compliance with shareholder meetings, creditor notifications, and necessary accounting and legal procedures.

7. The Tribunal found the Scheme fair, reasonable, compliant with the law, and not against public policy, leading to the sanctioning of the Scheme with the Appointed Date set as 31st March, 2019.

8. Directions were given for filing the Order with the Registrar of Companies, informing electronically, and adjudicating stamp duty within specified timelines, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations.

9. Regulatory authorities were instructed to act on the certified Order, and interested parties were granted liberty to seek further directions if required, concluding the judgment with the pronouncement in open court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates