Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (9) TMI 1049 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Set-off of short-term capital losses against exempt short-term capital gains under Article 13 of the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (IM Treaty).
2. Denial of the right to carry forward taxable long-term capital losses.
3. Inadvertent consideration of long-term capital gains as long-term capital losses.
4. Inadvertent consideration of non-existent short-term capital gains.
5. Levy of interest under section 234C of the Income Tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Set-off of Short-term Capital Losses Against Exempt Short-term Capital Gains:
The assessee, a tax resident of Mauritius, claimed exemption on capital gains from securities under Article 13 of the India-Mauritius DTAA. The AO argued that since the capital gains were exempt, the assessee could not carry forward capital losses. The DRP, however, observed that once the capital losses were determined and allowed to be carried forward in an earlier year, they could not be reviewed in subsequent years. The Tribunal concluded that exempt capital gains could not be adjusted against brought forward capital losses, allowing the assessee to carry forward the short-term capital losses without set-off against the exempt gains.

2. Denial of Right to Carry Forward Taxable Long-term Capital Losses:
The AO denied the carry forward of long-term capital losses despite these being determined and allowed in the previous assessment year. The DRP initially upheld this view but later rectified its order, allowing the carry forward of long-term capital losses after setting off against the current year's gains. The Tribunal directed that long-term capital losses from previous years should be carried forward without adjustment against exempt gains, aligning with the treatment of short-term losses.

3. Inadvertent Consideration of Long-term Capital Gains as Long-term Capital Losses:
The AO mistakenly considered long-term capital gains as losses. The DRP acknowledged this error, and the Tribunal directed rectification, ensuring accurate reflection of gains and losses.

4. Inadvertent Consideration of Non-existent Short-term Capital Gains:
The AO erroneously recorded non-existent short-term capital gains. The Tribunal instructed correction of this mistake, ensuring the assessee's income was accurately assessed.

5. Levy of Interest Under Section 234C:
The AO levied interest under section 234C for deferred advance tax payment. The assessee argued that tax was not deducted at source on interest income from Indian Oil Corporation, which should be considered while computing interest liability. The Tribunal agreed, referencing the Bombay High Court's ruling in DIT (International Taxation) Vs. NGC Network Asia LLC, and directed the AO to recompute the interest liability after excluding the tax deductible at source.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to:
- Allow the carry forward of short-term and long-term capital losses without adjusting against exempt gains.
- Correct the inadvertent errors regarding capital gains and losses.
- Recompute the interest liability under section 234C, considering the tax deductible at source.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates