Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2020 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (10) TMI 432 - HC - GSTDirection to the respondents to supply copies of the seized documents to the petitioner - HELD THAT - Mr. Harpreet Singh, senior standing counsel for the respondent accepts notice. He states that the photocopies of the seized documents shall be supplied by Superintendent of CGST, Anti-Evasion, Group-IV to the petitioner. - Accordingly directions issued.
Issues:
- Urgent listing of petition seeking direction to supply seized documents - Direction to supply photocopies of seized documents to petitioner - Meeting with Superintendent of CGST, Anti-Evasion, Group-IV - Furnishing list of required documents by petitioner - Timely supply of photocopies at petitioner's costs Analysis: The judgment by the Delhi High Court, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, pertains to a writ petition seeking a direction to supply copies of seized documents to the petitioner. The petition was listed urgently due to the expressed urgency. The court directed the respondent, represented by Mr. Harpreet Singh, to supply photocopies of the seized documents to the petitioner. The Superintendent of CGST, Anti-Evasion, Group-IV was instructed to provide the photocopies after the petitioner, or their authorized representative, meets with them on a specified date. The petitioner was further directed to furnish a list of required documents, and the photocopies were to be supplied at the petitioner's costs within three working days. The judgment highlights the importance of timely access to relevant documents in legal proceedings. It ensures that the petitioner is provided with the necessary materials for their case by directing the respondent to supply photocopies of the seized documents. The court's decision to facilitate a meeting between the petitioner and the Superintendent of CGST, Anti-Evasion, Group-IV demonstrates a practical approach to resolving the issue at hand. By specifying a deadline for the supply of photocopies and instructing the petitioner to bear the costs, the judgment promotes efficiency and clarity in the legal process. Overall, the judgment showcases the court's commitment to addressing urgent matters promptly and ensuring that parties have access to essential documentation for their cases. The detailed directions provided in the judgment aim to streamline the process of document sharing and underscore the importance of cooperation between the parties involved. The decision emphasizes the need for transparency and cooperation in legal proceedings, ultimately contributing to a fair and efficient resolution of the matter at hand.
|