9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (11) TMI 631 - Tri - Companies LawPermission to file written submissions - HELD THAT - Issue notice of this application to the respondents. Mr. Rohit Sud, the learned counsel accepts notice for all the legal heirs of the second respondent-Mr. Ashwini Chopra except for Mrs. Sudarshan Chopra. Mr. Ekansh Mishra, the learned counsel accepts notice for respondents No. 1, 3, 4 6. The applicant's counsel shall collect the notices from the Registry and send the same by speed post immediately to all respondents attaching therewith copy of the application and the entire paper book and the copy of this order. List on 21.09.2020.
Issues involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing CA No. 198/2020 2. Dismissal of CA No. 198/2020 3. Urgent hearing of CA No. 208/2020 Condonation of delay in filing CA No. 198/2020: The application sought condonation of delay in filing CA No. 198/2020. The Tribunal heard both sides and decided to condone the delay, allowing CA No. 199/2020 to proceed. Subsequently, CA No. 198/2020 was taken up for hearing and disposed of after the appellant submitted not pressing the CA but reserved the right to agitate for relief in the future. The Tribunal granted liberty to file written submissions and documents within two weeks, maintaining the permissions granted earlier. Dismissal of CA No. 198/2020: In the case of CA No. 198/2020, the senior counsel representing the appellant informed the Tribunal of not pressing the CA but reserved the right to seek relief in the future. Consequently, CA No. 198/2020 was dismissed as not pressed, with the appellant in CA No. 94/2020 allowed to submit written submissions and necessary documents within two weeks. The respondents in CA No. 94/2020 were also given the same timeline to file their written submissions along with relevant documents. Urgent hearing of CA No. 208/2020: Another application, CA No. 207/2020, was filed seeking an urgent hearing of CA No. 208/2020. The Tribunal allowed CA No. 207/2020, leading to CA No. 208/2020 being taken up for hearing. After due consideration, CA No. 207/2020 was disposed of, ensuring the timely progression of the legal proceedings. In the subsequent CA No. 208/2020, the Tribunal heard the senior counsel for the applicants and issued notices to the respondents. Various counsels accepted the notices on behalf of the respondents, and the necessary procedures for further legal actions were outlined, including the filing of affidavits and replies within specified timelines. This comprehensive analysis covers the issues of condonation of delay, dismissal of a case, and the urgent hearing of another case as addressed in the judgment delivered by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench.
|
