2020 (11) TMI 818 - AT - Income Tax

Grant of recognition u/s. 80G rejected - assessee trust obtained registration under section 12AA - HELD THAT - Impugned order of ld. CIT(E) is a non-speaking order. As rightly contended by the ld. counsel for the assessee, the generation of surplus and the fact that majority of receipts are by way of fees collection cannot be a ground to refuse recognition u/s. 80G - The assessee is admittedly existing for a charitable purpose of providing education. As rightly contended by the ld. DR, the impugned order is a non-speaking order and therefore it would be in the fitness of things to set aside the order of CIT(E) and remand back to him the issue of grant of recognition u/s. 80G of the Act to the assessee for fresh consideration. The CIT(E) will afford opportunity of being heard to the assessee before deciding the issue. Appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed.

Summary

Issues:
Application for recognition u/s. 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 denied by CIT(E) - Whether conditions under section 80G(5) fulfilled - Existence for charitable purposes - Legality of CIT(E) order - Remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis:
The appeal pertains to the denial of recognition u/s. 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [CIT(E)]. The appellant, a charitable trust established for educational and cultural activities, had applied for renewal of 80G recognition after the expiry of the previous one. The CIT(E) rejected the application citing doubts about the genuineness of the trust's activities and its surplus generation from fee collections. The appellant contended that the CIT(E) did not specify which conditions of section 80G(5) were violated and argued that being registered u/s. 12AA sufficed for charitable purposes. The Dispute Resolution Tribunal noted the non-speaking nature of the CIT(E) order and ruled that surplus generation and fee collections alone cannot justify denial of 80G recognition. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(E) order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a detailed explanation from the CIT(E) regarding the grounds for refusal. The appellant was granted an opportunity to present their case before the CIT(E) for a fair decision.

This case underscores the importance of fulfilling the conditions specified under section 80G(5) for obtaining recognition as a charitable institution. The Tribunal highlighted that mere generation of surplus or predominant fee collections do not automatically disqualify an entity from 80G recognition if its primary purpose aligns with charitable activities. The judgment also emphasizes the necessity of a reasoned and detailed order from the CIT(E) when refusing recognition, ensuring transparency and fairness in decision-making processes. The Tribunal's decision to remand the matter for fresh consideration signifies the commitment to upholding legal procedures and providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to address the concerns raised by the CIT(E). Ultimately, the ruling aims to promote accountability and clarity in the assessment of eligibility for tax benefits under the Income-tax Act, safeguarding the interests of genuine charitable organizations while maintaining regulatory standards.