9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (12) TMI 514 - HC - Central ExciseReward to the informer - Duty evasion - Directions to the respondents to constitute a committee so as to consider the case of the petitioner in a time-bound period - grievance of the petitioner is that as per the reward policy floated by the respondents, the reward as stipulated has not been paid to him - HELD THAT - The petitioner are directed to furnish the details of the petitioner along with the representation filed by the petitioner to the learned counsel who is appearing for respondent No.1, in a sealed cover. The learned counsel for respondent No.1, in turn, shall supply the said details to the concerned respondent authorities in a sealed cover - The representation will be decided by the concerned respondent authorities in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case and on the basis of materials on record, as expeditiously as possible and practicable. Petition disposed off.
Issues:
1. Non-payment of reward as per the reward policy by the respondents. Detailed Analysis: 1. The petitioner had provided intelligence input to the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, resulting in the recovery of a significant amount of tax and penalties. The petitioner claimed that the reward stipulated in the reward policy had not been paid to him. The court examined the facts and circumstances of the case and directed the petitioner to provide necessary details and representations to the respondent's counsel in a sealed cover for further action. 2. The court ordered the respondent authorities to consider the representation filed by the petitioner along with the details provided, in accordance with relevant laws, rules, regulations, and government policies applicable to the case. The authorities were instructed to make a decision on the representation expeditiously and practicably. The court disposed of the writ petition with these directives, ensuring a fair consideration of the petitioner's claim for the reward under the established policies.
|
