Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2021 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 179 - AT - Service Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the sizing of coal constitutes "manufacture" under the Central Excise Act.
2. Whether the sizing of coal is a "Business Auxiliary Service" under the Finance Act, 1994.
3. Applicability of service tax on the sizing of coal.
4. Limitation period for the demand of service tax.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the sizing of coal constitutes "manufacture" under the Central Excise Act:
The Tribunal examined the agreements between ICML and its customers, CESC Ltd. and Crescent Power Ltd., and determined that sizing of coal is an integral part of the coal manufacturing process. The Tribunal emphasized that the coal remains the property of ICML until it is delivered to the customers after sizing. The Tribunal noted that the Central Excise Act defines "manufacture" to include any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product. Therefore, sizing of coal, which is necessary to make the coal marketable, falls within the definition of "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act.

2. Whether the sizing of coal is a "Business Auxiliary Service" under the Finance Act, 1994:
The Tribunal held that the requirement for a service to be classified as a "Business Auxiliary Service" under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994, is that the goods must belong to the client, and the processing or production must be carried out on behalf of the client. In this case, the Tribunal found that the coal remains the property of ICML during the sizing process and is not processed on behalf of the clients, CESC or CPL. Therefore, the sizing of coal does not qualify as a "Business Auxiliary Service."

3. Applicability of service tax on the sizing of coal:
The Tribunal referred to previous decisions, including those in the cases of Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Northern Coalfields Ltd., and South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., which held that the activity of sizing coal is part of the manufacturing process and not a service. The Tribunal reiterated that if an activity amounts to "manufacture," it cannot be considered a service, as per the mutually exclusive nature of taxation under the Constitution. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that service tax is not applicable to the sizing of coal.

4. Limitation period for the demand of service tax:
The Tribunal briefly noted that the demand for the period from 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2011 is barred by limitation. However, since the primary issue of whether the activity constitutes a service was resolved in favor of ICML, the limitation issue did not require extensive discussion.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order, which had dropped the proceedings against ICML, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the sizing of coal is part of the manufacturing process, not a "Business Auxiliary Service," and therefore not subject to service tax. The Tribunal also emphasized the mutually exclusive nature of taxation under the Constitution, reinforcing that an activity classified as "manufacture" cannot simultaneously be treated as a service.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates