Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2021 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (2) TMI 1095 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Addition of income from inflation of expenses for A.Y.2013-14.
2. Addition towards on-money for A.Y.2014-15.

Issue 1: Addition of income from inflation of expenses for A.Y.2013-14:
The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the ld. CIT(A) correctly confirmed the addition of ?5,34,819/- as income from inflation of expenses for A.Y.2013-14. The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not appear, and after reviewing the material, found that parallel books of accounts showed expenses inflated through cheque payments and receiving cash back. The ld. AO sought to add ?21,39,275/- as inflation of expenses, while the assessee proposed adding 8% on a without prejudice basis. The Tribunal observed that the Hon'ble Income Tax Settlement Commission accepted 12% of the expenditure as income in the group cases. The ld. CIT(A) made an adhoc disallowance at 25% of inflated expenses, which the Tribunal deemed incorrect. They directed the ld. AO to add @12% of inflation of expenses in line with the Settlement Commission's direction in group company cases, partially allowing the assessee's appeal.

Issue 2: Addition towards on-money for A.Y.2014-15:
Regarding the addition of ?55 lakhs towards on-money for A.Y.2014-15, the Tribunal reviewed the ld. AO's decision to tax the net on-money received of ?2,20,00,000/- under Section 68 as unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal noted that the ld. CIT(A) recognized that only the profit element of on-money could be taxed, not the entire receipts. The ld. CIT(A) estimated the profit element at 25%, limiting the addition to ?55 lakhs instead of the full amount. The Tribunal found that the assessee's group offered 12% of on-money receipts as income before the Settlement Commission, which was accepted. They directed the ld. AO to add only 12% of on-money receipts as undisclosed income for the year, partially allowing the assessee's appeal.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeals of the assessee concerning the addition of income from inflation of expenses for A.Y.2013-14 and the addition towards on-money for A.Y.2014-15, directing the ld. AO to make adjustments based on the Settlement Commission's directions in the group company cases.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates