9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (7) TMI 31 - HC - Income TaxTDS u/s 195 - payments made by the assessee to M/s.Impact Fashion International when the service rendered by the non-resident is classified under Technical/managerial/professional services, which is deemed to accrue or arise in India under Section 9(i)(vii) of the Act - Tribunal deleted levy of TDS - HELD THAT - Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant-Revenue and following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the judgment reported in Evolv Clothing Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circleii( 1), Chennai 2018 (6) TMI 1324 - MADRAS HIGH COURT the question of law is decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Issues:
- Disallowance of selling expenses overseas under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. - Liability of TDS under Section 195 of the Act for payments made to non-residents classified under technical/managerial/professional services. Analysis: The judgment pertains to the appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal disallowing the selling expenses overseas claimed by the assessee under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claimed expenses as no TDS was made under Section 195 of the Act for payments made to parties, considering them as managerial and technical services under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Appellate Authority allowed the assessee's appeals, leading to the Revenue filing appeals before the Tribunal, which confirmed the previous orders. The substantial question of law raised by the appellant-Revenue in the appeals was whether TDS should be made on payments to a non-resident providing technical/managerial/professional services under Section 195 of the Act. The Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue acknowledged that a similar issue had been decided against the Revenue by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Madras High Court in a previous judgment. The Division Bench held that where there is no liability in India, there is no requirement for TDS deduction under Section 195 of the Act. The judgment cited relevant precedents to support the interpretation that no tax is deductible under Section 195 if the income is not chargeable in India. The judgment emphasized that under Section 9(1)(vii)(b), fees for technical services are taxable unless utilized for services outside India. The explanation provided clarified that technical services include managerial, technical, or consultancy services but not order-specific commissions. The court cited various cases to support the position that payments to non-residents for services rendered outside India are not liable for tax deduction in India. The judgment highlighted the definition of "fees for technical services" under Explanation (2) of Section 9(1)(vii) and reiterated that order-wise commissions are not covered under Section 40(a)(i) of the Act. Based on the precedents and legal interpretations, the Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeals filed by the Revenue, following the earlier decision of the Division Bench. The judgment concluded that the question of law was decided against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee, upholding the disallowance of TDS on payments made to non-residents providing services outside India.
|
