Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2021 (7) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (7) TMI 1177 - Tri - Companies Law


Issues:
Application for restoration of company name struck off by Registrar of Companies under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Detailed Analysis:
1. Background of the Company: The application filed by the Director cum 90% Shareholder of the Company seeks restoration of the name of the Company, M/s. Ferco Shutters & Seating India Private Limited, which was incorporated in 2013 with the main object of manufacturing doors, roller shutters, and public seating systems. The company failed to file financial statements and annual returns, leading to its strike off by the Registrar of Companies.

2. Reasons for Non-Compliance: The company faced challenges due to retrospective taxation in India, causing uncertainty for foreign investors and resulting in shelving plans for a manufacturing unit. Despite efforts to revive the business in Chennai, the company's name was already struck off by the Registrar, hindering its operations.

3. Legal Grounds for Restoration: The Applicant argued for restoration based on the 'just' ground as per Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Applicant presented evidence, including financial statements, ITR acknowledgment, sale deed, and a proposed blueprint for future operations, to support the restoration plea.

4. Judicial Precedents: The Tribunal considered past judicial interpretations of the term 'just' in company restoration cases, emphasizing fairness, reasonableness, and future business prospects. The Tribunal highlighted the need to assess future potential and revenue generation while deciding on restoration applications.

5. Decision and Directions: After reviewing the evidence and legal provisions, the Tribunal ordered the restoration of the company's name in the register maintained by the Registrar. The order included specific directions such as filing pending compliances, payment of costs, restrictions on asset disposal, and compliance affidavit submission within a specified timeline.

6. Additional Conditions: The order clarified that restoration does not automatically reinstate disqualified directors and required an undertaking regarding the use of company accounts during demonetization. It also preserved the Registrar's authority to take action for late filings or non-compliances under the Companies Act, 2013.

7. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration, subject to the outlined directions and conditions, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and safeguarding the interests of the company, its directors, and shareholders.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates