Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2021 (9) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (9) TMI 747 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
- Application under section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
- Breach of agreement and outstanding dues
- Ex-parte proceedings against the Corporate Debtor
- Calculation of outstanding sum and interest
- Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain the application
- Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP)
- Direction to deposit funds with the IRP
- Imposition of moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Code

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an application filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a Corporate Debtor. The Applicant, a private limited company engaged in tour & travel services, entered into an agreement with the Corporate Debtor for various services. Despite reminders and a demand notice, a significant amount of dues remained unpaid by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the application being filed. The Tribunal noted that the Corporate Debtor failed to respond or appear, resulting in ex-parte proceedings being conducted.

The Tribunal meticulously analyzed the outstanding sum owed by the Corporate Debtor, taking into account the terms of the agreement and the default in payment. It was established that the debt was not time-barred, and the application was within the period of limitation. The Applicant provided an affidavit affirming the absence of any dispute regarding the unpaid operational debt. Given the jurisdiction of the Tribunal over the Corporate Debtor's registered office location, the application was deemed admissible.

Furthermore, the Tribunal appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Specific conditions and disclosures were mandated for the appointed IRP. Additionally, the Operational Creditors were directed to deposit a specified sum with the IRP to cover necessary expenses. The imposition of a moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Code was ordered, restricting certain actions concerning the Corporate Debtor during the moratorium period.

In conclusion, the Tribunal admitted the application, establishing the default in payment by the Corporate Debtor. Various directions were issued regarding the appointment of the IRP, fund deposition, and the imposition of a moratorium, ensuring compliance and procedural adherence throughout the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates