9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (9) TMI 1102 - HC - Income TaxTDS u/s 195 - payments made to companies non resident - Tribunal was right in deleting the disallowance made by the AO holding that the amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) introduced by Finance Act, 2012 with retrospective effect from 01.06.1976 is not applicable and therefore no TDS needs to be deducted? - Tribunal held that the amounts paid by the assessee company to the non resident company for use of the assessee customer in India of operating net work payments, ATMs is not Royalty as per the provisions of Section 9(1)(vi) - HELD THAT - Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax and another 2021 (3) TMI 138 - SUPREME COURT has held in favour of the assessee. Deduction u/s 10A - expenses incurred in relation to travel in foreign country and communication charges are to be allowed both from the Export turnover and Total turnover - HELD THAT - Question answered against the Revenue in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-III v. HCL Technologies Ltd. 2018 (5) TMI 357 - SUPREME COURT As held that the definition of 'total turnover' given under Sections 80HHC and 80HHE cannot be adopted for the purpose of Section 10A as technical meaning of total turnover, which does not envisage reduction of any expenses from total amount, is to be taken into consideration for computing deduction under Section 10A; when meaning is clear, there is no necessity of importing meaning of 'total turnover' from other provisions. - Decided against the Revenue.
Issues:
1. Disallowance of TDS under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. 2. Liability to deduct tax at source on payments received by non-resident companies. 3. Classification of payments for use of customer network as Royalty under Section 9(1)(vi). 4. Requirement of TDS under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act. 5. Treatment of expenses related to foreign travel and communication charges in Export turnover. 6. Granting relief to the assessee for unrealized foreign exchange without corresponding deduction from total turnover. Analysis: 1. The Tax Case Appeal challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the disallowance of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The Tribunal had deleted the disallowance, citing the retrospective amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) by the Finance Act, 2012. The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment favoring the assessee in a similar case, leading to a decision against the Revenue on this issue. 2. The issue of liability to deduct tax at source on payments received by non-resident companies with permanent establishments in India was raised. The High Court relied on the Supreme Court's decision, which clarified that payments made by resident Indian end-users/distributors to non-resident computer software manufacturers/suppliers did not constitute royalty for the use of copyright, thus absolving the persons from the obligation to deduct TDS under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act. 3. The classification of payments made by the assessee company to non-resident companies for the use of the customer network in India as Royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) was disputed. The High Court, following the Supreme Court's ruling, determined that such payments did not amount to royalty for the use of copyright in computer software, thereby ruling against the Revenue on this issue. 4. The Tribunal's decision regarding the requirement of TDS under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act on payments made to two companies was challenged. The High Court, guided by the Supreme Court's interpretation, concluded that no TDS was necessary in this scenario, thus ruling against the Revenue. 5. The treatment of expenses related to foreign travel and communication charges in Export turnover was questioned. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the High Court held that the technical meaning of total turnover, without reducing any expenses, should be considered for computing deductions under Section 10A, resulting in a decision against the Revenue on this issue. 6. Lastly, the grant of relief to the assessee for unrealized foreign exchange without a corresponding deduction from the total turnover was examined. Following the precedent set by the Supreme Court, the High Court ruled against the Revenue on this issue, dismissing the Tax Case Appeal and answering the substantial questions of law against the Revenue party.
|
