Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2021 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (12) TMI 888 - HC - GST


Issues:
Accused challenging the conditions of bail bond and surety bond set by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, and later modified by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Ludhiana.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Conditions of Bail Bond and Surety Bond
The petitioner, an accused under Section 132(1)(b) of CGST Act, 2017, was released on regular bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. but faced stringent conditions including executing bail bonds/surety bonds. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, directed him to execute bonds amounting to ?1.10 crores and two sureties of like amount, along with other conditions. The Addl. Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, later modified these conditions, reducing the bond amount to ?30 lakhs each, with two sureties of the same amount, and a bank guarantee of ?20 lakhs. The petitioner found even these modified conditions unjust and beyond his means, leading to this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Issue 2: Justification of Modified Conditions
The respondent-complainant argued that the modified conditions were justified due to the nature of the economic offence involving a substantial amount of ?15.91 crores. The imposition of bail bond and surety bond for ?30 lakhs each was deemed necessary to ensure the accused's presence and safeguard the complainant's interest. The need for a bank guarantee was also supported to secure potential recovery. Relevant judgments were cited to support this argument.

Issue 3: Judicial Principles and Discretion in Granting Bail
The Court highlighted the discretionary nature of granting regular bail to accused undertrials, considering factors like the alleged crime's nature, trial stage, and accused's role. Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. provides the right to seek bail if investigation isn't concluded within a stipulated time. The bond amount should be reasonable, not exceeding the accused's means, as per Section 440 Cr.P.C. The accused's right to bail and presumption of innocence were emphasized.

Conclusion:
The Court found the petitioner's continued detention unjust, especially considering the absence of a filed complaint/charge-sheet within the statutory period. The accused's prolonged custody before explaining charges was deemed unfair. The modified conditions were deemed excessive, and the order dated 15.7.2021 was further modified. The accused was ordered to be released on bail upon executing a bond of ?10 lakhs and two sureties of the same amount, while setting aside the bank guarantee condition of ?20 lakhs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates