9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (1) TMI 480 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - CIT-A deleted the addition given a finding that assessee has not earned any exempt income - HELD THAT - As CIT-A held that no disallowance can be made in the absence of exempt income and for the aforesaid proposition, he relied on the decision of Lakhani Marketing 2014 (7) TMI 44 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT . Before us, no fallacy in the findings of CIT(A) has been pointed out by the Revenue nor has Revenue placed on record any contrary binding decision in its support. In such a situation, we find no reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A) and thus the ground of Revenue is dismissed.
Issues:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. 2. Interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014. 3. Permission to add, delete, or amend grounds of appeal. Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 14A of the Act The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning the disallowance of ?1,56,40,968 under Section 14A of the Act for Assessment Year 2015-16. The appellant, a company engaged in infrastructure projects, had filed its return of income showing a total loss. The Assessing Officer (AO) made the disallowance, which was subsequently deleted by the CIT(A) on the grounds that the appellant had not earned any exempt income. The CIT(A) relied on a decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to support this conclusion. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that in the absence of exempt income, no disallowance under Section 14A could be made. Issue 2: Interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014 The second ground raised by the Revenue was related to the interpretation of CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014, which clarified the disallowance under Rule 8D read with Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in ignoring this circular. However, the ITAT did not delve into this aspect as the primary issue was the disallowance under Section 14A, and no fallacy in the CIT(A)'s decision was pointed out by the Revenue. Issue 3: Permission to add, delete, or amend grounds of appeal The appellant sought permission to add, delete, or amend grounds of appeal, which was a procedural matter. However, since the primary issue of disallowance under Section 14A was the focus of the appeal, the ITAT did not address this request separately in its judgment. In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act due to the absence of exempt income. The judgment highlighted the importance of factual findings and legal precedents in determining the applicability of tax provisions, emphasizing the need for a clear nexus between income earned and disallowances made under the Act.
|
