Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (1) TMI 975 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Corporate Debtor for default in payment.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Default in Payment
The State Bank of India, as the Financial Creditor, filed an application seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s. Ethnic Tobacco (India) Limited, the Corporate Debtor, for defaulting on a payment of ?137,68,37,255.53. The Financial Creditor invoked Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, alleging non-payment of dues despite various loans and working capital facilities provided to the Corporate Debtor.

Issue 2: Financial Assistance and Loan Facilities
The Financial Creditor, a Commercial Bank, sanctioned credit facilities to the Corporate Debtor upon the latter's request for financial assistance and working capital loan facilities. Various agreements were executed between the Corporate Debtor and the Financial Creditor for availing financial assistance, leading to the Corporate Debtor's default in repayment despite multiple reminders.

Issue 3: Allegations and Counter-Statements
The Corporate Debtor contended that it had made payments totaling ?300.41 Crore towards interest and bank charges until its account was declared as Non-Performing Asset (NPA). The Corporate Debtor attributed its financial distress to a global commodities price crash, resulting in insufficient stocks to support its financial exposure to the Financial Creditor, exacerbated by the hostile attitude of the latter.

Issue 4: Adjudication and Decision
After hearing arguments from both parties, the Tribunal found merit in the Financial Creditor's application and admitted it for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor. An Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed to oversee the resolution process, and a moratorium was declared in respect of the Corporate Debtor as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal's decision to admit the application for CIRP against the Corporate Debtor was based on the default in payment, the Financial Creditor's claims, and the failure of the Corporate Debtor to address the outstanding dues adequately. The appointment of an IRP and declaration of a moratorium signify the initiation of the resolution process to address the financial distress and non-payment issues between the parties involved.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates