Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (1) TMI 1161 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Petition seeking quashing of assessment order due to technical glitches in uploading information/documents.

Analysis:
The petitioner sought the quashing of an assessment order dated 24.09.2021 passed by respondent No.1, citing technical issues in uploading information onto the department's portal. The petitioner highlighted that due to glitches and constraints, certain information was not uploaded, leading to the passing of the impugned order. The petitioner requested another opportunity to provide the necessary documents either through online upload or physical copies. The respondents argued that since the relevant information was not uploaded before the order, there was no option but to pass it. Despite the contentions from both sides, the Court observed that the petitioner's inability to furnish the documents prior to the order was due to technical issues. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to provide the required information either online or in physical form.

The Court acknowledged the specific assertion by the petitioner regarding the technical glitches preventing the uploading of documents. In the interest of justice, the Court deemed it appropriate to grant the petitioner another opportunity to furnish the necessary information/documents. The Court directed respondent No.1 to reconsider the matter afresh after the petitioner provides the relevant documents either by uploading them online or submitting physical copies. The order allowed for a hearing for the petitioner and instructed respondent No.1 to conclude the proceedings in accordance with the law. It was also noted that all rival contentions were kept open, and no opinion was expressed on them, ensuring fairness and impartiality in the process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates