Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (2) TMI 988 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Entitlement to deduction under section 80IA without setting off losses/unabsorbed depreciation.
2. Interpretation of the initial assessment year in Section 80IA(5).
3. Option to choose the first/initial assessment year of claim for deduction under section 80-IA.

Entitlement to Deduction under Section 80IA:
The appellant/Revenue challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, questioning the assessee's entitlement to deduction under section 80IA without setting off losses/unabsorbed depreciation. The appellant raised substantial questions of law regarding the correctness of the Tribunal's decision. However, the appellant's counsel acknowledged that previous court decisions, including the one in Prabhu Spinning Mills (P) Limited, had consistently ruled against the Revenue. The Circular No.1/2016 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes further clarified the interpretation of the term 'initial assessment year' in Section 80IA(5), emphasizing the assessee's option to choose the first year for claiming deduction. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the entitlement of the assessee to the deduction under section 80IA.

Interpretation of the Initial Assessment Year:
The second substantial question of law revolved around the correct interpretation of the initial assessment year in Section 80IA(5). The Circular No.1/2016 provided clarity on this issue, emphasizing that the initial assessment year should be the year opted for by the assessee for claiming deduction under section 80IA. The circular highlighted that the assessee has the discretion to select the first year for claiming the deduction, subject to the prescribed slab of fifteen or twenty years. This interpretation was crucial in determining the continuity and eligibility of the deduction under section 80IA. Consequently, the court relied on the circular's guidance to dismiss the appeal, reinforcing the significance of the initial assessment year chosen by the assessee.

Option to Choose the First/Initial Assessment Year:
The third substantial question of law pertained to whether the assessee has the option to choose the first/initial assessment year for claiming deduction under section 80-IA. The Circular No.1/2016 provided explicit instructions that the assessee indeed has the discretion to select the initial assessment year for claiming the deduction under section 80IA. This choice is pivotal in determining the eligibility and continuity of the deduction for ten consecutive years, as specified in the circular. The court's decision, guided by the circular's directives, upheld the assessee's right to exercise this option, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal in favor of the respondent/assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates