Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (2) TMI 1202 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Confirmation of disallowance of ?2,70,396/- for late payment of employee's contribution to ESI and PF.
2. Applicability of recent amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B by the Finance Act, 2021.
3. Charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Confirmation of Disallowance of ?2,70,396/- for Late Payment of Employee's Contribution to ESI and PF
The primary issue in the appeals was the confirmation of disallowance of ?2,70,396/- made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to late payments towards Employee Provident Fund (EPF) and Employee State Insurance (ESI). The payments were made after the due dates specified in the respective Acts but before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1).

The appellant argued that the contributions were deposited before the due date for filing the return of income and cited precedents from the Rajasthan High Court, including CIT vs. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. and CIT vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, which held that such contributions should not be disallowed if deposited before the return filing due date. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, referencing similar decisions from other jurisdictions, and directed the deletion of the disallowance.

Issue 2: Applicability of Recent Amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B by the Finance Act, 2021
The Revenue argued that the recent amendments to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by the Finance Act, 2021, which clarified that employee contributions to specified funds must be deposited within the due dates specified in the respective Acts, should apply retrospectively. However, the Tribunal noted that the explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act, 2021, explicitly stated that these amendments would take effect from April 1, 2021, and apply to assessment years 2021-22 and onwards. Since the assessment year in question was 2018-19, the Tribunal held that the amendments could not be applied retrospectively.

Issue 3: Charging of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C
The appellants also contested the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C, arguing that interest should be charged on the returned income, not the assessed income. The Tribunal found this ground to be consequential, as the primary disallowance had been deleted. Therefore, no further adjudication on this issue was necessary.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of the disallowance of ?2,70,396/- for late payment of employee contributions to ESI and PF, and held that the recent amendments to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by the Finance Act, 2021, could not be applied retrospectively to the assessment year 2018-19. Consequently, the issue of charging interest under Sections 234B and 234C was deemed consequential and did not require further adjudication.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates