Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (8) TMI 681 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Set off of brought forward losses of Rs. 13,43,71,999/- pertaining to M/s. Kovalam Hotels Ltd.
2. Applicability of Section 72A versus Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Set off of Brought Forward Losses of Rs. 13,43,71,999/- Pertaining to M/s. Kovalam Hotels Ltd.:

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] that upheld the assessee's claim of setting off brought forward losses of Rs. 13,43,71,999/- from M/s. Kovalam Hotels Ltd. The assessee had revised its taxable income by claiming set off of these losses and unabsorbed depreciation after M/s. Kovalam Hotels Ltd. amalgamated with the assessee company effective from 01/04/2006.

The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the claim, stating that the business loss of Rs. 13,43,71,999/- incurred prior to the previous year 2005-06 was not eligible for carry forward due to the applicability of Section 79 of the Income Tax Act. The AO noted that there was a change in the shareholding pattern of Kovalam Hotels Ltd. during the financial year 2005-06, making the provisions of Section 79 applicable, which disallowed the carry forward of losses.

2. Applicability of Section 72A versus Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The CIT(A) held that Section 72A, being a specific provision related to the amalgamation of companies, overrides the general provisions of Section 79. The CIT(A) referenced various case laws, including a decision by the Hon'ble ITAT in the case of Tata Autocomp System Ltd vs. ACIT, which emphasized that specific provisions prevail over general ones. The CIT(A) concluded that since the scheme of amalgamation was approved by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, Section 72A should apply, allowing the assessee to carry forward the losses of Kovalam Hotels Ltd.

The Revenue argued that the AO of Kovalam Hotels Ltd. had correctly declined the carry forward of losses for AY 2006-07 due to a change in shareholding. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that Section 79 did not apply and relied on multiple Tribunal decisions to support the claim for set off of losses.

The Tribunal noted two key events:
1. In AY 2006-07, M/s. Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. acquired more than 51% shareholding in M/s. Kovalam Hotels Ltd., making Section 79 applicable.
2. In AY 2007-08, M/s. Kovalam Hotels Ltd. amalgamated with the assessee company, invoking Section 72A.

The Tribunal concluded that since the AO of Kovalam Hotels Ltd. had already rejected the carry forward of losses for AY 2006-07, the same losses could not be set off by the assessee for AY 2007-08 unless the higher appellate authorities reversed the AO's decision. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue of set off under Section 72A is contingent upon the resolution of the carry forward issue under Section 79 in the case of Kovalam Hotels Ltd.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, directing the AO to give effect to the set off of business losses based on the appellate authorities' decision in the case of Kovalam Hotels Ltd. regarding the carry forward of losses under Section 79. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the order pronounced on 10/08/2022.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates