Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (9) TMI 911 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Disposal of Company Petition by Adjudicating Authority.
2. Financial Creditor's unwillingness to settle with Corporate Debtor.
3. Jurisdiction of Adjudicating Authority under Section 7 of IBC, 2016.

Issue 1: Disposal of Company Petition by Adjudicating Authority:
The appeal was filed by the Financial Creditor against the Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority in a Company Petition. The Corporate Debtor had acknowledged its liability to pay and made an offer to settle the amount claimed by the Financial Creditor. The Adjudicating Authority directed the Corporate Debtor to deposit the amount within 45 days. The Financial Creditor expressed unwillingness to settle, leading to the appeal challenging the disposal of the Company Petition.

Issue 2: Financial Creditor's unwillingness to settle with Corporate Debtor:
The Financial Creditor contended that the Adjudicating Authority erred in allowing the Corporate Debtor to deposit the amount despite the Financial Creditor's unwillingness to settle. The Corporate Debtor offered to pay the entire defaulted amount within 45 days, which the Financial Creditor refused, citing lack of confidence in the Corporate Debtor's past conduct. The Adjudicating Authority permitted the deposit and granted the Financial Creditor liberty to revive the Company Petition if the amount was not paid within the specified period.

Issue 3: Jurisdiction of Adjudicating Authority under Section 7 of IBC, 2016:
The judgment referred to a recent Supreme Court case emphasizing that the Adjudicating Authority must consider factors beyond debt and default before initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of assessing feasibility and relevant circumstances before admitting a Section 7 Application. In this case, the Adjudicating Authority's decision to allow the Corporate Debtor to deposit the defaulted amount within 45 days was deemed appropriate, with the Financial Creditor retaining the option to revive the application if necessary.

In conclusion, the Appeal was dismissed as the Adjudicating Authority's decision to permit the Corporate Debtor to deposit the defaulted amount was found to be in line with the provisions of the IBC, 2016. The interests of the Financial Creditor were safeguarded with the liberty granted to revive the application if the amount was not paid within the specified period. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering various factors beyond debt and default in insolvency proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates