Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2022 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (10) TMI 179 - HC - GST


Issues:
1. Refusal of refund by authorities based on belated filing under section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
2. Interpretation and application of Notification No. 13/2022 dated 5th July, 2022, issued by the Central Government regarding the time limit for filing refund applications under the CGST Act.

Analysis:
1. The petitions sought to set aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and Assistant Commissioner regarding the non-grant of CGST refund to the petitioners and requested the sanction of the refund. The authorities had contended that the refund applications were filed belatedly under section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, both parties agreed that the Notification dated 5th July, 2022, issued by the Central Government, excluded the time limit for filing refund applications. This exclusion was crucial in determining the timeliness of the petitioners' refund claims.

2. The Notification, in particular clause (ii), excluded the period from 1st March, 2020, to 28th February, 2022, for the computation of the period of limitation for filing refund applications under section 54 of the CGST Act. The learned advocate for the respondents did not dispute this aspect and produced an email confirming the application of the Notification to the petitioners' case. Consequently, the competent authority was directed to process the refund claims of the petitioners within the specified time frame of 12 weeks from the date of the order, provided the petitioners were found eligible for the refund along with statutory interest.

3. The judgment clarified the impact of the Notification on the petitioners' refund claims, emphasizing the need for authorities to consider the revised time limit for filing refund applications under the CGST Act. By acknowledging the exclusion of the specified period for limitation computation, the court ensured that the petitioners' claims were evaluated within the extended timeframe, highlighting the importance of regulatory notifications in addressing procedural matters under tax laws.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates