9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (11) TMI 718 - AT - Income TaxReopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition in respect of an altogether new issue - whether the AO is entitled to make addition on the basis of a new issue, when he has not made any addition on the issues for which the assessment was reopened? - HELD THAT - In the instant case, the AO has not made any addition on the issues for which the assessment was reopened. However, he has made addition of an item, which was not stated in the reasons for reopening. Hence, under these set of facts, the AO could not have made the addition of interest income received on income tax refund as per the ratio of the decision rendered in Jet Airways Ltd 2010 (4) TMI 431 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY . Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the addition so made. The order passed by Ld CIT(A) on this issue stands set aside - Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of addition made in the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. 2. Whether the Assessing Officer (AO) can make an addition on a new issue if no addition is made on the issues for which the assessment was reopened. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Validity of Addition Made in the Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act: The assessee challenged the order dated 20.07.2022 passed by the learned CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, related to the assessment year (A.Y.) 2012-13. The primary contention was the validity of the addition made in the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The AO reopened the assessment by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Act. The reasons recorded for reopening included the discrepancy between the income credited in the assessee's account and the total receipts shown in the Profit & Loss Account and a transaction of Rs.45,00,000/- with M/s Skylark Logistics Agencies Pvt Ltd. However, the AO did not make any addition regarding these issues. Instead, the AO made an addition for interest income received on an income tax refund, which was not mentioned in the reasons for reopening. 2. Whether the Assessing Officer (AO) Can Make an Addition on a New Issue if No Addition is Made on the Issues for Which the Assessment Was Reopened: The assessee contended that the AO was not justified in making an addition based on a new issue when no addition was made on the issues for which the assessment was reopened. This contention was supported by the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Jet Airways (I) Ltd (2011) (331 ITR 236) (Bom). The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Jet Airways Ltd held that the AO must assess or reassess the income which he has reason to believe had escaped assessment and also any other income chargeable to tax which comes to his notice subsequently during the proceedings. However, if the AO does not assess or reassess the income for which the assessment was reopened, he cannot independently assess any other income that comes to his notice subsequently. This interpretation was supported by the language of section 147 and the insertion of Explanation 3 by the Finance (No. 2) Act of 2009, which clarified that the AO could assess any other income that comes to his notice during the proceedings, but only if he assesses the income for which the assessment was reopened. In the present case, since the AO did not make any addition on the issues for which the assessment was reopened, he could not have made the addition of interest income received on an income tax refund. This was in line with the ratio of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Jet Airways Ltd. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the AO could not have made the addition of interest income received on an income tax refund, as it was not mentioned in the reasons for reopening the assessment. Therefore, the addition made by the AO was deleted, and the order passed by the learned CIT(A) on this issue was set aside. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. Order Pronounced: The order was pronounced in the open court on 07.11.2022.
|
