Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2022 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (11) TMI 785 - HC - GST


Issues:
Challenge to rejection of refund claim under Section 54(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 based on Circular No.157/13/2021-GST; Supersession of the Circular by a Government notification dated 05.07.2022 directing exclusion of time limit for filing refund application between 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022; Setting aside of the impugned order dated 21.01.2022 and direction for reconsideration of refund application under Sections 54 and 55 of the Act in light of the new notification; Clarification on the direction in reference to a specific petition for refund extension.

Analysis:

The judgment pertains to two Writ Petitions challenging the rejection of a refund claim under Section 54(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, based on Circular No.157/13/2021-GST, which stated that the time limit for filing a refund application cannot be extended, even during a pandemic. The Petitioner and the Respondent both acknowledged that the Circular had been superseded by a Government notification dated 05.07.2022, which directed the exclusion of the time period between 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 for computing the limitation period for filing refund applications under Sections 54 and 55 of the Act.

The Court, in light of the supersession of the Circular, set aside the impugned order dated 21.01.2022. The Respondent was directed to reconsider the request/application for refund in accordance with Sections 54 and 55 of the Act, taking into account the Notification No.13 of 2022 - Central Tax, dated 05.07.2022. The Court emphasized that the refund application should be processed as per the new notification.

Regarding a specific petition (W.P.(MD)No.13191 of 2022), where a portion of the refund request had been extended, the Court clarified that the direction to set aside the impugned order was only applicable to the portion that had been rejected due to limitation issues. Consequently, the Court disposed of the Writ Petitions with no costs and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates