Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2022 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (11) TMI 1067 - HC - GST


Issues:
1. Representation seeking grant of GST components and interest
2. VAT and Service Tax registration transition to GST
3. Change in tax rates under GST regime
4. Show Cause Notice for GST demand
5. Pending representation before State Government

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a Partnership Firm involved in land development and road works, filed a Writ Petition to direct the Respondents to consider their representation dated 12.08.2022 for the grant of GST components and interest to be paid to the 5th Respondent. The petitioner had ongoing contracts pre and post-GST implementation, facing challenges due to tax rate variations.

2. The petitioner highlighted their VAT payment at 2% under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and exemption from service tax under specific notifications. With the transition to GST, the tax rate fluctuated from 18% to 12% and back to 18%, causing difficulties for contractors. The Government of Tamil Nadu issued notifications shifting the liability of GST under works contracts to procuring entities.

3. The petitioner received a Show Cause Notice demanding GST payment of Rs. 5,11,38,438 under Section 74(1) of The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The notice referenced the Government notifications emphasizing the obligation of procuring entities to bear the GST liability. The petitioner sought time to calculate and release the applicable GST, pending the representation before the State Government.

4. The Court directed Respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation within four weeks and allowed the petitioner to request additional time due to the pending representation. The Court clarified that it had not expressed any view on the representation's merits, leaving it to the Respondents to evaluate independently. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates