Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (12) TMI 338 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Rejection of the assessee's claim for recognition under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Assessment of charitable versus religious activities of the assessee-trust.
3. Compliance with the conditions stipulated under Section 80G(5) of the Act.
4. Evaluation of the head-wise details of capital expenditure.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Rejection of the Assessee's Claim for Recognition under Section 80G

The primary grievance of the assessee was the rejection of their claim for recognition under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee-trust had applied for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) and provided details of its charitable activities, including running a school for poor children, a gaushala, an old-age home, and initiatives for the upliftment of the weaker sections of society. The department rejected the claim on the grounds that the trust received a donation of Rs. 13,50,00,000/- from another trust for constructing and maintaining a temple, which was not included in the objects of the assessee-trust. The department concluded that the trust failed to substantiate the genuineness of its charitable activities.

Issue 2: Assessment of Charitable versus Religious Activities

The assessee argued that the donation received was to be used for multiple purposes, including charitable activities, and not solely for religious purposes. The donation was authorized by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune, who directed that a portion of the funds be used for various charitable purposes, including the construction of a temple. The assessee emphasized that the temple had not yet been constructed and that they would seek necessary amendments to their trust deed if they proceeded with the construction. The department, however, maintained that the construction and maintenance of the temple constituted a religious activity, which was not aligned with the trust's stated objectives.

Issue 3: Compliance with Conditions under Section 80G(5)

The tribunal noted that the assessee-trust was already registered under Section 12AA of the Act, which implied that the Commissioner had previously satisfied himself regarding the genuineness of the trust's charitable activities. The tribunal held that once a trust is granted registration under Section 12AA, the question of whether it is established for charitable purposes should not arise again. The tribunal also referred to Section 80G(5B), which allows a trust to incur expenditure of a religious nature up to 5% of its total income without losing its eligibility for approval under Section 80G.

Issue 4: Evaluation of Head-wise Details of Capital Expenditure

The department contended that the assessee had not provided complete head-wise details of its capital expenditure for the relevant financial years. However, the assessee argued that they had submitted audited balance sheets and detailed schedules of expenditures, which were available to the department. The tribunal found that the department's claim was unsubstantiated as the necessary documents had been provided by the assessee.

Conclusion:

The tribunal concluded that the assessee-trust had complied with the conditions stipulated under Section 80G(5) of the Act and that the department had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the trust was engaged in substantial religious activities. The tribunal directed the Commissioner to grant the assessee-trust approval under Section 80G. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on December 6, 2022.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates