9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (12) TMI 569 - AT - Income TaxAddition on account of expenditure as paid/credited in F.Y. 2010-11, but was accrued/became due during F.Y. 2009-10 - HELD THAT - It is emerges from the material on record that, the assessee was maintaining books of accounts which being duly audited by expert, i.e. Chartered Accountant. The report of the chartered accountant has been furnished before the A.O. At the time of assessment proceedings, AO has disallowed the expenditure only on the ground that, it has been claimed as prior period expenditure although the assessee was following the merchandise system of the accounting. A.O has not of the opinion that the expenditure itself is bogus per se. The expenditure has been incurred for the business and it is not the case of the A.O that, it is not allowable u/s 37 (1) - Since, the assessee has already paid more tax in Financial Year 2009-10, which is in the tax bracket of 30% and the claim is revenue neutral, i.e. that is there is no loss of Revenue. While deleting the addition made by the A.O, Ld.CIT(A) has also considered all the above facts. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the finding of the facts by the CIT(A) and also the conclusion arrived by the Ld.CIT(A). Therefore, the order of Ld. CIT(A) which requires no interference. Accordingly, we inclined to dismiss the Revenue s Grounds of Appeal.
Issues:
Appeal against deletion of addition of expenditure for assessment year 2011-12 - Application of mercantile system of accounting - Exception under CBDT Instruction No. 17/2019 - Disallowance of expenditure claimed in previous year - Revenue's appeal for interference by Tribunal. Analysis: The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 13,90,612 related to expenditure for the assessment year 2011-12. The Revenue contended that the expenditure, though paid in the financial year 2010-11, had accrued in the financial year 2009-10, and should have been crystallized in the previous year under the mercantile system of accounting. The case was considered an exception under CBDT Instruction No. 17/2019 for further filing of the appeal. The assessee, a regional rural bank, had its income for the year under consideration assessed at Rs. 1,07,59,71,080. The dispute arose from the deduction of expenditure of Rs. 13,90,612, paid in 2010-11 but accrued in 2009-10 as per AIR Information. The assessment order initially added this amount, citing the merchandise system of accounting. However, the CIT(A) allowed the appeal and deleted the addition. During the proceedings, the Revenue argued for interference, emphasizing the application of the merchandise system of accounting. In contrast, the assessee's counsel highlighted that the expenditure was not disputed as bogus, and additional tax had already been paid in 2009-10. The Tribunal considered the expert-audited books of accounts, the nature of the expenditure, and the revenue neutrality of the claim. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was legitimate, incurred for business purposes, and not disallowed under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. Given that the expenditure was revenue-neutral and the assessee had paid additional tax in 2009-10, there was no loss to the Revenue. The CIT(A) had duly considered all relevant facts, leading the Tribunal to dismiss the Revenue's grounds of appeal and uphold the deletion of the addition. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision. The order was pronounced on 2nd August 2022.
|
