Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (1) TMI 515 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Applicability of Section 194A regarding non-deduction of TDS and invoking provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Deduction Under Section 80P:

The primary issue revolves around whether the appellant, a cooperative registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, qualifies for deductions under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the deduction on the grounds that the appellant is not a "Cooperative Society" as defined under Section 2(19) of the Act, but merely a "Cooperative" registered under a different statute. The AO's stance was supported by the judgments of the Division Bench of the Bengaluru Tribunal, which held that deductions under Section 80P are only available to Cooperative Societies registered under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959.

The Tribunal, however, referred to the Karnataka High Court's decision in the case of Swabhimani Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd., which clarified that entities registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, fit the definition of "cooperative society" under Section 2(19) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court emphasized that both the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959, and the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, are cognate statutes dealing with cooperative societies, and thus, entities registered under either act should be treated as cooperative societies for the purposes of Section 80P.

The Tribunal aligned with the High Court's interpretation, allowing the appellant's claim for deduction under Section 80P. The Tribunal also cited similar judgments from the jurisdictional High Court, reinforcing that entities registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act are entitled to the benefits of Section 80P.

2. Applicability of Section 194A Regarding Non-Deduction of TDS:

The second issue concerns the disallowance of expenses due to non-deduction of TDS under Section 194A, invoking the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The AO had disallowed the appellant's claims on the grounds that they failed to deduct TDS on interest payments.

The Tribunal referred to several precedents, including the case of Kodangulur Town Co-operative Bank Ltd., where it was held that cooperative societies engaged in banking are not required to deduct TDS on interest payments to their members. The Tribunal noted that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Circular No. 9 of 2002 clarified that members of a cooperative bank are exempt from TDS on interest payments, as per Section 194A(3)(v) of the Act.

Further, the Tribunal referenced the Madras High Court's judgment in Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., which elaborated that amendments to Section 194A, effective from June 1, 2015, explicitly mandated TDS on interest payments by cooperative banks to their members. However, prior to this amendment, cooperative banks were not required to deduct TDS on interest payments to their members.

In light of these judgments, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to deduct TDS on interest payments to its members for the period before June 1, 2015. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim, setting aside the AO's disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia).

Conclusion:

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The appellant was deemed eligible for deductions under Section 80P, as entities registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, qualify as cooperative societies under the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the appellant was not required to deduct TDS on interest payments to its members before June 1, 2015, thus invalidating the AO's disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The appeal was allowed, and the order pronounced in the open court on November 17, 2022.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates