Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2023 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (1) TMI 915 - HC - GST


Issues:
1. Whether the provisional attachment order of the property should continue after filing statutory appeals under Section 107 of the Act.

Analysis:
The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 seeking to quash the attachment order of debtors and immovable property. The petitioner had filed statutory appeals for assessment years 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22, making the required deposit under Section 107(6) of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Despite this, the attached property and debtors were not released, invoking Sections 79 and 83 of the Act. The respondents argued that the property remained attached to secure remaining taxes, even though the bank accounts were de-frozen.

The main issue revolved around whether the provisional attachment order should continue after the statutory appeals were filed, as per Sections 107(6) and 107(7) of the Act. Section 107(6) mandates a deposit before filing an appeal, and Section 107(7) states that recovery proceedings for the balance amount are stayed upon such deposit. The petitioner had complied with these requirements for the relevant assessment years.

The petitioner had filed appeals for the mentioned assessment years and made the necessary deposits. The appellate authority had granted interim relief and de-froze the bank accounts. The petitioner had also deposited the demanded amounts for some years and had undertaken to deposit the balance within a specified time frame. The petitioner's compliance with Section 107(6) was supported by the appellate authority's order.

The Court held that the recovery proceedings should have been stayed as per Section 107(7) once the petitioner made the required deposits for the appeals. The order only de-freezing bank accounts was deemed against the Act's provisions. Therefore, if the petitioner cleared all due amounts for 2017-18 and 2018-19 within ten days and made the pre-deposit for 2021-22, the attachment orders on property and debtors should be revoked immediately. Any pending applications were also disposed of in light of this decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates