9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (3) TMI 1 - AT - Insolvency and BankruptcyMaintainability of appeal - HELD THAT - Intervenor submits that he does not want to press the said I.A. The I.A. No. 3670 of 2019 is dismissed. Hearing stands concluded.
Issues:
1. Dismissal of I.A. No. 3670 of 2019 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 816 of 2019. Detailed Analysis: The judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, involved the dismissal of I.A. No. 3670 of 2019 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 816 of 2019. The Ld. Counsel for the Proposed Intervenor, 'Premco Rail Engineers Ltd.,' expressed a decision not to press the said I.A., leading to its dismissal. The matter was heard with Mr. P. Nagesh, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Himanshu Satija, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 and 3, and Mr. Manmeet Singh, Advocate for Respondent No. 2/RP. Subsequently, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Advocate for the Appellant, presented arguments by way of rebuttal. Following the conclusion of the hearing, the judgment was reserved. The Tribunal allowed the Ld. Counsel for the parties to file their hard copy of written submissions or additional written submissions, not exceeding three pages, along with relevant case laws, within one week. The judgment highlighted the procedural aspects of the case, including the submission of written arguments and relevant case laws by the concerned parties. The dismissal of I.A. No. 3670 of 2019 was a significant decision made by the Tribunal based on the expressed intention of the Proposed Intervenor. The judgment reserved indicated that a detailed analysis and consideration of the arguments presented during the hearing would be undertaken before delivering a final decision. The involvement of multiple advocates representing different parties added complexity to the proceedings, requiring a thorough examination of the legal issues raised before reaching a conclusion.
|
