Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (3) TMI 252 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Validity of assessment order passed under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 without issuing notice under section 143(2).
2. Jurisdiction of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
3. Consideration of errors and prejudice in assuming jurisdiction under section 263.
4. Requirement of notice under section 143(2) for a valid assessment order.

Issue 1: Validity of Assessment Order Passed Under Section 144 Without Notice Under Section 143(2):
The case involved an appeal against an assessment order passed under section 144 of the Income-tax Act without issuing a notice under section 143(2). The appellant contended that the absence of such a notice rendered the assessment order invalid. The CIT(A) observed that the AO had passed the assessment order on a best judgment basis without considering all facts correctly. The appellant's argument was supported by legal precedents emphasizing the mandatory nature of issuing a notice under section 143(2) before completing the assessment. The Tribunal held that the absence of a valid notice under section 143(2) made the assessment order ab-initio void and not subject to revision under section 263.

Issue 2: Jurisdiction of PCIT Under Section 263:
The PCIT had set aside the assessment order under section 144 for revision under section 263, citing errors prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The appellant challenged this decision, arguing that the assessment was not valid in the first place due to the absence of a notice under section 143(2). The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, quashing the PCIT's order under section 263. The Tribunal emphasized that without a valid assessment order, there could be no revision under section 263, thereby upholding the appellant's appeal.

Issue 3: Consideration of Errors and Prejudice in Assuming Jurisdiction Under Section 263:
The PCIT invoked section 263 based on errors and prejudice in the assessment order passed under section 144. However, the Tribunal highlighted that the fundamental issue of the absence of a notice under section 143(2) rendered the assessment order invalid from the start. As a result, the Tribunal concluded that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was not valid, as the assessment order itself was defective due to the lack of a mandatory notice under section 143(2).

Issue 4: Requirement of Notice Under Section 143(2) for a Valid Assessment Order:
The Tribunal reiterated the legal position that the issuance of a notice under section 143(2) before completing an assessment is mandatory. Citing relevant legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that the absence of such a notice renders the assessment order ab-initio void and not subject to revision under section 263. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the appellant's argument regarding the necessity of a notice under section 143(2) for a valid assessment order, ultimately leading to the allowance of the appeal.

In summary, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of issuing a notice under section 143(2) for a valid assessment order and highlighting that the absence of such a notice renders the assessment ab-initio void and not subject to revision under section 263. The Tribunal quashed the PCIT's order under section 263, concluding that without a valid assessment order, there can be no revision under section 263.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates