Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (6) TMI 282 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) due to delay in filing Form No.67.

Summary:

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal:
The appeal filed by the assessee was directed against the order dated 16/12/2022 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, relating to A.Y.2021-22. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay of 57 days in filing the appeal and requested the Bench to consider the date of filing as 15.2.2023. After considering the contents of the condonation petition along with the affidavit, the delay was condoned and the appeal was admitted for adjudication.

Denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) due to delay in filing Form No.67:
The assessee, an individual, filed the return of income for A.Y 2021-22, disclosing foreign income and claiming FTC which was paid in the USA. The CPC Bengaluru did not consider the FTC while processing the ITR, leading to the appeal before the CIT (A). The CIT (A)NFAC dismissed the appeal, stating non-compliance with mandatory conditions in Rule 128 of the IT Rules and the delay in submission of Form 67 was not condoned. The assessee appealed before the Tribunal, citing precedents where FTC was allowed despite delays. The Tribunal observed that filing Form 67 is directory, not mandatory, and allowed the FTC after due verification, following previous decisions. The appeal was allowed, directing the AO to allow the FTC after verification.

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed by the Tribunal, emphasizing the directory nature of filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit. The decision was based on precedents and the specific circumstances of the case, where the delay was deemed reasonable.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates