Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (6) TMI 564 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
The appeal involves issues such as non-deduction of TDS under section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, demand raised under section 201(1) & (1A) for failure to deposit TDS on interest payments, classification of interest on compensation/enhanced compensation, denial of opportunity to produce supporting documents, and non-compliance with various judgments of jurisdictional High Court and ITAT.

Non-deduction of TDS under section 194A:
The appellant, a branch of a statutory body, failed to deduct TDS on interest payments amounting to Rs. 7,92,55,734/- during the relevant assessment year. The ITO (TDS) passed an order under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act, raising a demand of Rs. 2,10,82,026/- for non-compliance. The appellant contended that TDS under section 194A was not applicable, leading to the dispute.

Classification of interest on compensation/enhanced compensation:
The Tribunal considered whether the interest received by landowners on enhanced compensation was 'income from other sources' under section 56 of the Act, attracting TDS provisions under section 194A. Citing relevant legal provisions and judgments, the Tribunal held that such interest was not taxable as income from other sources, concluding that TDS provisions were not applicable.

Denial of opportunity to produce supporting documents:
The appellant raised concerns regarding the lack of sufficient opportunity to present supporting documents before the authorities. However, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant based on the decision in a previous case with similar facts, where the issue was resolved in favor of the assessee.

Compliance with legal judgments:
The appellant also argued that the authorities did not follow various judgments of the jurisdictional High Court and ITAT. The Tribunal, relying on precedent and legal provisions, allowed the grounds raised by the appellant, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.

Separate Judgment:
The order was pronounced by Ms. Astha Chandra, Judicial Member, with the appeal being allowed based on the Tribunal's decision in a previous case and the legal provisions regarding the classification of interest on compensation/enhanced compensation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates