Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (8) TMI 211 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments
2. Segmental Computation
3. Application of Filters and Comparables
4. Interest on Outstanding Receivables
5. Corporate Tax Adjustments

Summary:

Transfer Pricing Adjustments:
The learned AO, TPO, and DRP made an adjustment of INR 25,02,52,221/- under section 92CA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which includes INR 22,45,36,880/- for the ITES segment and INR 2,57,15,341/- for interest on delayed receivables. The AO/TPO/DRP erred in rejecting the TP documentation and conducting a fresh comparability analysis by introducing various filters. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to reconsider the comparables and apply appropriate filters.

Segmental Computation:
The AO/TPO/DRP erred in computing the operating segmental margin by reallocating the employee cost within the EDS segment based on revenue. The Tribunal directed the TPO to re-allocate the expenses among the segments appropriately and recalculate the margins.

Application of Filters and Comparables:
The Tribunal upheld the application of turnover filters, excluding companies with turnover more than Rs. 200 crores, and directed the TPO to exclude Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd., Infosys BPM Services Ltd., and SPI Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. from the final set of comparables. The Tribunal also directed the AO/TPO to provide working capital adjustments as per the guidelines, allowing the assessee to provide necessary data.

Interest on Outstanding Receivables:
The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to calculate the interest on delayed receivables afresh using 6 months LIBOR plus 300 basis points with a mark-up of 100 basis points, considering it as a separate international transaction. The assessee was directed to provide necessary documents for this calculation.

Corporate Tax Adjustments:
The Tribunal noted that the AO/DRP erred in disallowing an amount under Sec. 14A read with Rule 8D towards expenses incurred to earn exempt dividend income from mutual funds, without appreciating that investments were made out of internal accruals. The AO was also directed to grant TDS credits and advance tax credits for merged entities and to reconsider the interest levied under Sec. 234B and 234C.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the AO/TPO for fresh calculations and reconsideration of certain adjustments. The Tribunal emphasized the need for appropriate benchmarking and adjustments as per the guidelines and legal precedents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates