Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (9) TMI 1166 - HC - Income Tax


Issues involved: Condonation of delay in filing the appeal, Addition to taxable income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Interpretation of Section 153A of the Act, Application of principles in completed assessments without incriminating material.

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal: An application was filed seeking condonation of delay of 113 days in filing the appeal. The delay was condoned as the respondent did not oppose the prayer made in the application.

Addition to taxable income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act: The Assessing Officer added Rs. 3,50,00,000 to the taxable income of the respondent under Section 68 of the Act, considering it as undisclosed income discovered during a search and seizure operation at the respondent's premises. The Tribunal held that without incriminating material, no addition could have been made by the AO as it was a case of completed assessment.

Interpretation of Section 153A of the Act: Notices under Section 153A were issued, and the assessment for the relevant Assessment Year was completed. The Tribunal concluded that without incriminating material found during the search, no further addition to the income was warranted under Section 153A. The Tribunal's decision was in line with the judgment in CIT vs. Kabul Chawla and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell.

Application of principles in completed assessments without incriminating material: The Tribunal held that in completed assessments without incriminating material, no further addition to the income is justified. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates