Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 694 - AT - Income Tax


Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case are related to the assessment of unexplained cash found during a search and seizure operation, the justification of addition of cash under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the treatment of cash belonging to family members and a company.

Assessment of Unexplained Cash:
During a search and seizure operation, cash amounting to Rs. 48,66,000 was found from the residential premises of the assessee. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated a portion of this amount as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanations and documents regarding the source of the cash. The AO observed discrepancies in the statements made by the assessee during the search operation and the assessment proceedings, leading to the disallowance of Rs. 43,86,000 as unexplained money.

Decision of the CIT(A):
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] upheld a partial addition of Rs. 18,95,859 out of the total disallowed amount. The CIT(A) considered the cash in hand available with family members as on 31.03.2017 and estimated cash expenses incurred from April 2017 to August 2017. The CIT(A) calculated the cash in hand available with family members as Rs. 29,70,141 as of 10.08.2017, thereby restricting the addition to Rs. 18,95,859.

Arguments Before the Tribunal:
The assessee appealed against the partial addition of Rs. 18,95,859 before the Appellate Tribunal. The assessee reiterated that the cash found during the search belonged to family members as well as the company, Easy Trip Planners Pvt. Ltd. The assessee provided details of cash held by family members and the company, along with explanations regarding the cash management practices of the company, including separate divisions and cash transactions.

Tribunal's Decision:
After hearing arguments from both parties, the Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)'s estimation of expenses and the reasoning behind the partial addition. The Tribunal found that the cash found during the search was adequately explained through the cash balances in the books of accounts of the company and the statement of affairs filed by family members. The Tribunal held that no further addition was necessary, as the cash was satisfactorily accounted for in the company's records and the family members' statements.

Conclusion:
Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the addition of Rs. 18,95,859 was not justified given the satisfactory explanations and documentation provided regarding the source and ownership of the cash found during the search operation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates