Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 699 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Existence of Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment (DAPE) in India.
2. Attribution of business profits to the alleged DAPE.
3. Tax rate on interest income from income tax refund.
4. Credit of taxes deducted at source (TDS).
5. Levy of additional tax on 'Special Income Other Than Section 115BBE'.
6. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

1. Existence of Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment (DAPE) in India:
The assessee argued that Adobe Systems India Private Limited (Adobe India) is a legally and economically independent entity and not a Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment (DAPE) of the assessee. The Ld. AO and DRP, however, held that Adobe India is a DAPE of the assessee in India under Article 5(6) of the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). They concluded that Adobe India is actively involved in the sales and supply of software distributed by the assessee and performs core business functions, thus constituting a DAPE.

2. Attribution of Business Profits to the Alleged DAPE:
The Ld. AO attributed INR 1,74,64,31,465/- as business profits to the alleged DAPE in India. The assessee contended that once the associated enterprise (Adobe India) has been remunerated on an arm's length basis, no further profits should be attributed to the alleged PE. The Tribunal, citing previous decisions and the Supreme Court rulings in DIT vs. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and ADIT vs. E-Funds IT Solution Inc., upheld that no further attribution of profits is required if the transactions are at arm's length. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on this ground.

3. Tax Rate on Interest Income from Income Tax Refund:
The Ld. AO taxed the interest on income tax refund at 40% plus surcharge and cess, as per the provisions of the Act, instead of the beneficial tax rate of 10% under Article 11 of the India-Ireland DTAA. The Tribunal, agreeing with the Ld. CIT(A)'s order in the assessee's own case, directed the Ld. AO to apply the 10% tax rate on the interest income as per the DTAA.

4. Credit of Taxes Deducted at Source (TDS):
The assessee claimed that the Ld. AO did not allow TDS credit amounting to INR 2,48,86,907/-. The Tribunal directed the Ld. AO to verify the claim and grant the TDS credit as per law.

5. Levy of Additional Tax on 'Special Income Other Than Section 115BBE':
The assessee challenged the levy of additional tax of INR 4,58,03,533/- on 'Special Income Other Than Section 115BBE'. The Tribunal found no discussion regarding this in the assessment order and directed the Ld. AO to verify the claim and grant relief accordingly.

6. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings Under Section 270A:
The assessee contested the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A of the Act. The Tribunal deemed this ground premature and did not adjudicate on it.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee on the grounds of DAPE existence and attribution of profits, directed the application of the beneficial tax rate on interest income, and instructed verification and appropriate action on TDS credit and additional tax levy issues. The initiation of penalty proceedings was not adjudicated.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates