Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 1019 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
The issues involved in this judgment are the confirmation of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of unexplained investments and publicity expenses, and the subsequent affirmations by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (Ld. CIT(A)).

Issue 1 - Unexplained Investments:
The first issue pertains to the addition of Rs. 14,66,622/- by the AO on account of unexplained investments under section 69B of the Act, which was confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A).

The assessee, engaged in liquor trading, filed the return of income for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The AO observed discrepancies in the accounting of sales but found no instance of non-recording of sales by the assessee. The AO estimated the suppressed value of stocks at Rs. 29,33,243/- and added 50% of this value, amounting to Rs. 14,66,622/-, to the income of the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) affirmed this addition. However, the Appellate Tribunal found the addition to be arbitrary and lacking basis, as the AO did not consider the evidences provided by the assessee such as purchase bills and stock registers. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, ruling in favor of the assessee.

Issue 2 - Publicity Expenses:
The second issue concerns the addition of Rs. 11,00,120/- by the AO on account of publicity expenses, which was confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A).

The AO added the amount to the income of the assessee as the expenses were not proven to be incurred solely for the business purpose. However, the Tribunal noted that these expenses were part of recurring schemes by liquor manufacturers, where the assessee incurred publicity expenses reimbursed by suppliers. As the expenses were related to the liquor trading business and were reimbursed by suppliers, the Tribunal found the AO's addition unjustified. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, thereby allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to delete both the additions related to unexplained investments and publicity expenses.

Kolkata, the 12th October, 2023.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates