Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2023 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (11) TMI 688 - AT - Companies Law


Issues:
The issues involved in the judgment are the restoration of the name of a company in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies and the compliance with statutory provisions under the Companies Act, 2013.

Issue 1: Company Restoration

The appeal was filed against the Impugned Order dated 28.09.2021 passed by the NCLT in Appeal 16/252/ND/2021 seeking restoration of the name of the Company in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies. The Company, Garg Medical Solutions Private Limited, was considered defunct due to nil revenue from operations during the Financial Year 2016-17 to 2018-19. The NCLT dismissed the appeal due to lack of evidence showing business operations.

Issue 2: Compliance with Statutory Provisions

The Counsel for the Appellant argued that the Company had complied with statutory filings until the Financial Year 2016-17 and had unsecured Creditors totaling Rs.21 Lakhs. They claimed that the Company had done all statutory compliance and filing for the Financial Year ending 31.03.2017. The Appellant also highlighted the ownership of a Fixed Asset, a property in Faridabad, Haryana, and distinguished the case from that of a shell Company. The Respondent, Office of the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana, contended that the Company failed to demonstrate ongoing business operations and referred to the decision in the case of `Alliance Commodities Pvt. Ltd.’ Vs. `Office of Registrar of Companies, West Bengal.

Judgment

Upon reviewing the submissions, the Tribunal found that the Company was struck off on 08.08.2018, had complied with statutory filings until 2016-17, and had outstanding liabilities and assets. Citing previous decisions, the Tribunal concluded that restoration was just and equitable due to the Company's assets and liabilities. The Impugned Order was set aside, and the name of the Appellant Company was restored to the Register of Companies with specified compliances. The Appellant was directed to pay costs, file annual returns and balance sheets, and comply with other statutory requirements.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates