Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (1) TMI 642 - AT - Service Tax


Issues Involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are related to the demand of service tax on "Commercial Training and Coaching Centre Services" and "Airport Service" provided by M/s Haryana Institute of Civil Aviation (HICA). The Department appealed against the non-imposition of penalty under Sections 76, 77 & 78 by the Adjudicating Authority.

Comprehensive details of the judgment for each issue involved:

1. Demand on "Commercial Training and Coaching Centre Services":
The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of service tax on "Commercial Training and Coaching Centre Services" provided by HICA. However, the appellant argued that the demand was not sustainable, citing precedents like the case of Indian Institute of Aircraft Engineering. The Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court decision which held that the qualification recognized by law for such training activities exempts them from service tax liability. The Tribunal further noted that the courses conducted by HICA were essential for employment in specialized fields, leading to the exemption of service tax liability on "Commercial Training and Coaching Centre Services." Consequently, the demand on this service was deemed not sustainable.

2. Demand on "Airport Service":
The appellant contended that the demand on "Airport Service" provided by HICA was covered under the small-scale exemption during the relevant period. The Tribunal agreed with this argument, stating that the demand on "Airport Service" fell within the exemption limit. Therefore, the demand on "Airport Services" was considered sustainable within the exemption limit.

3. Imposition of Penalty:
The Department appealed against the non-imposition of penalty under Sections 76, 77 & 78 by the Adjudicating Authority. However, the Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal, upholding the decision of the Adjudicating Authority to refrain from imposing any penalty.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by HICA by dropping the demand on "Commercial Training and Coaching Centre Services" and dismissed the appeal filed by the Department regarding the imposition of penalty. The judgment clarified the legal position regarding the exemption of service tax on certain training activities recognized by law and the applicability of small-scale exemptions to specific services provided by HICA.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates