9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 845 - AT - Income TaxDismissal of appeal as assessee s name was struck off by the Registrar of the company - Unexplained cash credit addition not decided by CIT(A) as made by the AO on the ground that the assessee has been struck off from the ROC records and even has surrendered the PAN and therefore the assessee was no longer in existence - HELD THAT - The appeal was dismissed ex-parte without deciding the same on merit which is not correct as the first appellate authority should have decided the issue on merits. As perused the decision of M/s Dwarka Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. 2022 (5) TMI 1385 - ITAT DELHI in which the similar issue has been decided in favour of the assessee by the Co-ordinate Bench by holding that the appeal cannot be dismissed on the ground that the assessee s name was struck off by the Registrar of the company and the assessee cannot be treated as cancelled and non-existent for the purpose of realizing the amount due to the company and for payment or discharge of liability or obligation of the assessee. Thus we hold that the appeal has been wrongly dismissed by the CIT(A) on the ground of assessee company name being struck off from the rolls of ROC. Accordingly we restore the issue/appeal to the file of CIT(A) with the direction to decide the same on merit.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dismissing the appeal on the ground that the assessee company was struck off is valid. 2. Whether the appeal should have been decided on merits despite the company being struck off. Summary: Issue 1: Validity of Ld. CIT(A)'s Dismissal of Appeal The only issue raised by the assessee was that the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on the ground that the assessee was struck off from the ROC records and had surrendered its PAN, hence, no longer in existence. The AO had added Rs. 25,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit after reopening the assessment u/s 147 of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte without deciding it on merits, which was challenged by the assessee. Issue 2: Necessity of Deciding the Appeal on MeritsThe Tribunal found that the dismissal of the appeal by the Ld. CIT(A) was incorrect as it should have been decided on merits. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of Delhi in the case of M/s Dwarka Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, which held that an appeal cannot be dismissed solely because the assessee's name was struck off by the Registrar of Companies. The Tribunal emphasized that even if a company is struck off, it is still necessary to adjudicate the tax liability to avoid jeopardizing the rights of the directors and ensuring the realization of dues and discharge of liabilities. Legal Principles and Cases Cited:The Tribunal discussed the provisions under Sections 248 and 250 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deal with the striking off of companies and the consequent liabilities. The Tribunal also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mahagun Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and the Rajasthan High Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt. Ltd., both emphasizing the need to adjudicate tax liabilities even if the company is struck off. Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the appeal filed by the struck-off assessee company is maintainable and should be decided on merits. The case was restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with the direction to decide the issue on merits. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 30th November, 2023.
|
